Archives
Archives
| From: | Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu@×××××××××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} CUPS alternative? | ||
| Date: | Sun, 03 Feb 2008 11:22:02 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200802031239.21779.shrdlu@unlimitedmail.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} CUPS alternative? by Grant |
||
| 1 | On Sunday 3 February 2008, Grant wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > OK, port knocking is going back on the todo list. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Note that I'm not claiming that portknocking is the solution to every |
| 6 | security problem. Only that it has its uses in certain scenarios. |
| 7 | A drawback of portknocking is that it requires modified clients |
| 8 | (==knock-aware) for the services, so I think it's not suitable for your |
| 9 | remote printing case. |
| 10 | It can, however, be useful in other situations. |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |