1 |
On Thursday, 9 November 2017 19:22:29 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday, November 9, 2017 6:14:26 PM CET Grant Edwards wrote: |
3 |
> > On 2017-11-09, Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > > Apologies in advance for the long post, but has anyone else come across |
5 |
> > > this? |
6 |
> > > |
7 |
> > > gen/storage/public/interfaces/blobs.mojom-shared-internal.h:539:5: |
8 |
> > > internal |
9 |
> > > compiler error: Segmentation fault |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > } |
12 |
> > > ^ |
13 |
> > > |
14 |
> > > Please submit a full bug report, |
15 |
> > > with preprocessed source if appropriate. |
16 |
> > > See <https://bugs.gentoo.org/> for instructions. |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > Does it always fault in exactly the same spot? |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > If not... |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > When I've run into "random" gcc segfaults when compiling very large |
23 |
> > programs, it's always been a hardware problem. Every time except one, |
24 |
> > it was failing RAM. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > I'd run memtest86 overnight. |
27 |
> |
28 |
> Also check it is not overheating. |
29 |
> The one time I had random gcc segfaults was when I accidentally forgot |
30 |
> decent airflow for the CPU about 20+ years ago. |
31 |
> |
32 |
> -- |
33 |
> Joost |
34 |
|
35 |
Thanks Joost, it seems like random fault. I hope it is not faulty RAM - after |
36 |
4 years of no evident problems. Anyway, I rebooted and the second time the |
37 |
compile completed without error. :-/ |
38 |
|
39 |
This PC has a Zalman CPU cooler, the heat sink of which I flattened out to |
40 |
make sure it makes good contact with the CPU surface. It will not show above |
41 |
45-46.5°C even when running cpuburn on all cores. |
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
Regards, |
45 |
Mick |