| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On Fri, 05 May 2006 08:22:29 +0200 Alexander Skwar |
| 4 |
<listen@×××××××××××××××.name> wrote: |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
| 7 |
> > On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote: |
| 8 |
> >> lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
| 9 |
> >> > Outlook and Outlook Express are the two worst mail clients in the |
| 10 |
> >> > universe. |
| 11 |
> >> |
| 12 |
> >> They are not. Lotus Notes beats them to that. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Ouch. You sure you want to be handing out a judgement of that |
| 15 |
> > magnitude like that? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Yes, I am sure. Well, my statement is at least true reg. Notes 5. |
| 18 |
> I do not know Notes 6 or newer. They might have changed Notes and |
| 19 |
> made it better. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Ahem, not really better. Well, a bit. But judging Notes for its eMail |
| 22 |
qualities is like judging MS Word for its abilities as a programmer's |
| 23 |
editor. Notes _has_ its worth, too, and has some very interesting |
| 24 |
features, namely the configurable database replication to the client. |
| 25 |
Especially the offline capabilities are pretty good. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-hwh |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives