| 1 |
On Oct 13, 3:00 am, "Trenton Adams" <trenton.d.ad...@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hi Guys, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Is there a policy for thesyncingof the mirrors, that would prevent |
| 5 |
> inconsistencies? I'm not talking about inconsistencies with the |
| 6 |
> masterserver(s), as that would be kind of difficult to have atomicsyncingbetween all servers involved. What I'm referring to is |
| 7 |
> inconsistencies in terms of mesyncingwith a mirror. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
[...] |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If each mirror'srsyncis not shutdown duringsyncing, wouldn't it be |
| 12 |
> better if it actually was? I think we'd rather get a connection |
| 13 |
> refused message, and have *emerge* try another mirror, than to have an |
| 14 |
> inconsistent portage state, don't we think? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Any thoughts? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Yes, it sounds like a good practice to me. I just notice it is the |
| 19 |
"update portage tree" does in this gentoo wiki tip. |
| 20 |
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Providing_binary_packages#Updating_your_portage_tree_once_a_day |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
# sync gentoo-portage |
| 23 |
2 8 * * * root /etc/init.d/rsyncd stop;emerge |
| 24 |
--sync;/etc/init.d/rsyncd start |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Régis |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives