Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} DNS: no SOA record or DNSSEC

[Alan McKinnon]

On 27/08/2013 12:30, Grant wrote:
> I use a fairly well-known (free) DNS provider.  I just checked my DNS
> settings at dnscheck.pingdom.com and I got:
>
> 1. No SOA record was found when querying the name server. This is most
> probably due to a misconfiguration at the name server - a zone must
> have a SOA record.
>
> 2. Nameserver * does not do DNSSEC extra processing.
>
> Are either of these something to worry about?


Yes. Without an SOA record you don't actually have a zone.

You should stop using those crappy dns checker sites, they tend to be
full of shit, unreliable and operate off someone's idea of how DNS
should be instead of reading the actual RFCs on the matter. Our abuse
team has long ticket lists from people trusting those sites and now
think there's something with how we do glue. Hint: Our glue is right and
proper :-)


Instead just use dig, using google.com as an example get the NS records
first:

$ dig ns google.com +short
ns3.google.com.
ns2.google.com.
ns1.google.com.
ns4.google.com.


Then query each of those name server in turn directly for the SOA:

$ dig soa google.com +short @ns3.google.com
ns1.google.com. dns-admin.google.com. 2013081400 7200 1800 1209600 300

That's a correct SOA record.

What could have happened with that test site is the query timed out and
the site assumed the universe was therefore about to explode. Use such
if you want but always verify the results yourself using dig.

The DNSSEC message is not a problem. It means your provider does not use
DNSSEC. Again, the universe will not explode from this, we all got along
just fine with plain unsigned DNS transfers for 30 years. DNSSEC is a
way to digitally sign zone transfers and updates. Nothing to do with
zone resolution.

-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com