Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild?
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 21:58:24
Message-Id: 4E6696B0.6030704@gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? by Grant Edwards
1 Grant Edwards wrote:
2 > On 2011-09-06, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote:
3 >> Grant Edwards wrote:
4 >>> On 2011-09-06, Neil Bothwick<neil@××××××××××.uk> wrote:
5 >>>> On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:25:22 +0100, Stroller wrote:
6 >>>>
7 >>>>> Isn't CUPS really bug and bloaty and horrible?
8 >>> It's definitely huge. It does however seem to work pretty well.
9 >>>
10 >>>
11 >> Huge?
12 >>
13 >> root@fireball / # equery s cups
14 >> * net-print/cups-1.5.0-r2
15 >> Total files : 482
16 >> Total size : 6.41 MiB
17 >> root@fireball / #
18 >>
19 >>
20 >> If that is considered huge, we have a new standard. lol
21 > I stand corrected. For some reason I was under the impression it was
22 > a lot bigger than that.
23 >
24
25 I thought so. If it was huge, I was hoping you would post yours. Maybe
26 you have more "stuff" turned on that I do or something.
27
28 I do like the next reply in this thread tho. lol
29
30 Dale
31
32 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: What is up with the libreoffice ebuild? Hartmut Figge <h.figge@×××.de>