Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Basic device for a Gentoo router/firewall?
Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 14:21:58
Message-Id: 40415BDE-EB69-42F9-9268-6A0AAADEAF25@stellar.eclipse.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] {OT} Basic device for a Gentoo router/firewall? by Grant
1 On 22 May 2010, at 22:41, Grant wrote:
2
3 > Does anyone know of a basic device that would function well as a
4 > Gentoo router/firewall? Using typical hardware seems like overkill.
5 > I should be able to offload package compilation duties to another
6 > local machine on the network. It would also be nice if it were small,
7 > cheap, and power-efficient.
8
9 I believe stuff like this <http://www.routerboard.com/pricelist.php?started_from_home=1
10 > is really common on the Athens network, but it all appears to be
11 MIPS. I would imagine that, rather than run Gentoo MIPS, one would use
12 something like Openembedded, although searching for the name of that I
13 was reminded of Gentoo Embedded, which might be ideal.
14
15 One used to be able to get 486 / 586 boards of similar form-factor,
16 but I have no idea if you still can. Cross-compiling using distcc is
17 probably a PITA, and I believe x86 is less power-efficient than MIPS
18 or ARM, but I don't know by how much. An Atom based board might be the
19 best compromise if you want to use "real Gentoo" - the problem with
20 anything else is that you have to learn to use / build a specialist
21 router-distro if you want to do anything extra-ordinary with it.
22
23 Stroller.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Basic device for a Gentoo router/firewall? Adam <adam@××××××××××.au>