| 1 |
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 18.09:26 walt wrote: |
| 2 |
> This is an ~amd64 machine, up to date as of today. The strange thing |
| 3 |
> is that lvm did *not* fail to start -- it's working perfectly. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Now, being an Incorrigible Old Fart(TM) I'm still using openrc, and |
| 6 |
> who knows what evil lurks in that paleolithic package? :p |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Anyone else getting this (false) alarm during boot? |
| 9 |
I have a similar thing on my ~x86, but the difference is that I know why I get it. |
| 10 |
I have successfully be able to create an initramfs that does a vgscan, vgchange -a y and mounts /usr (which is on LVM). |
| 11 |
But now I (naturally) I get "LVM failed to start" (and of cause "failed to mount /usr) when openrc processes the init-scripts. |
| 12 |
So, my question is really - should I remove lvm from the init-process and put noauto in /etc/fstab for /usr? |
| 13 |
Even if it is on my playground box I still want to be able to boot it. |
| 14 |
When these two "issues" are solved I'm going to let my system update udev. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Dan Johansson, <http://www.dmj.nu> |
| 18 |
*************************************************** |
| 19 |
This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons! |
| 20 |
*************************************************** |
Archives