| 1 |
On Sat, 21 May 2011 16:40:02 +0200, Andrea Conti wrote about Re: |
| 2 |
[gentoo-user] RFC: Implementing a spamfiltering frontend: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
[snip] |
| 5 |
>The problem with having two passes through postfix in the mail routing |
| 6 |
>chain is that you either run two separate postfix instances with |
| 7 |
>independent configurations or you have to figure out a robust way to |
| 8 |
>avoid loops. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
>It can be done, it's just more difficult :) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Actually, it is quite simple: you just configure a re-injection port in |
| 13 |
your original instance of Postfix. I have been running this |
| 14 |
arrangement for some few years now, and I use port 25 for the initial |
| 15 |
insertion of an email into Postfix and port 10025 for amavisd to |
| 16 |
re-insert the message after spam and virus scans have been completed. |
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Regards, |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Dave [RLU #314465] |
| 21 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
| 22 |
dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon) |
| 23 |
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* |
Archives