1 |
Sorry for capturing the thread. :) |
2 |
|
3 |
What about the glibc upgrade from 2.3 to 2.4. |
4 |
Does the same concerning "emerge -e world" apply here |
5 |
(e.g. it is recommended to do it) ? |
6 |
|
7 |
Or is it a more relaxed situation and simply emerging glibc 2.4 is |
8 |
enough ? |
9 |
|
10 |
BR |
11 |
Thomas |
12 |
|
13 |
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 12:48 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: |
14 |
> Dale wrote: |
15 |
> > Since this is a major upgrade you may want to reconsider. So I guess it |
16 |
> > depends on how much risk you want to take with it. If anything, at |
17 |
> > least do a emerge -e system. That should get you booted even if the GUI |
18 |
> > fails for some reason. |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Dale |
21 |
> > :-) :-) |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> As has always been the case, C++ applications are probably the most |
26 |
> likely to be affected by ABI changes. So, if you run KDE or Qt apps, |
27 |
> then it is probably a very good idea to rebuild world. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Tom |
30 |
> |
31 |
> |
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |