| 1 |
On 13/04/2014 23:00, Peter Humphrey wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hello list, me again :-( |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> (Apologies if I'm trying your patience - my own is wearing pretty thin.) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> I've discovered a problem in portage on the same Atom mini-server as I've |
| 7 |
> mentioned here recently. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> # emerge -epv world |
| 10 |
> --->8 |
| 11 |
> Total: 329 packages (329 reinstalls), Size of downloads: 595,566 kB |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> # emerge -epvk world |
| 14 |
> --->8 |
| 15 |
> Total: 240 packages (240 reinstalls, 240 binaries), Size of downloads: 0 kB |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> # emerge -epv world > list |
| 18 |
> # emerge -epvk world > listk |
| 19 |
> # diff list listk |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> ...merely shows the contents of list, then the contents of listk, so clearly |
| 22 |
> the packages are being evaluated in a different order. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> # find /usr/portage/packages -type f | wc |
| 25 |
> 330 330 17879 |
| 26 |
> (The extra file is /usr/portage/packages/Packages, i.e. not a portage package.) |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> # alias emerge |
| 29 |
> -bash: alias: emerge: not found |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> How is it possible for portage to emerge packages differently when it's |
| 32 |
> installing from packages? |
| 33 |
> |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
A proper answer involves posting the full verbose output of those emerge |
| 36 |
commands. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Without that we can only guess. My guess is that USE is different |
| 39 |
between your Atom and your build host, so using -k causes a different |
| 40 |
set of package deps to be pulled in. |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
-- |
| 45 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 46 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives