| 1 |
Anthony Metcalf wrote: |
| 2 |
> Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> It's been a while but make sure you have switched to the new gcc and |
| 5 |
>> it is working fine before removing the old one. Nothing worse than |
| 6 |
>> removing gcc then finding out the new one isn't . . . functional. |
| 7 |
>> Sort of fun to fix. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Dale |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Tell me about it! |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Hint: Don't then unpack a stage 3 tarball in / to get a working gcc |
| 16 |
> back...... |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
True. That would work but I would be doing a fresh install. I suspect |
| 20 |
there would be a few orphaned files around after that. Still best to |
| 21 |
'test the waters' before diving in on such a critical package. I don't |
| 22 |
usually remove mine until all my packages have been rebuilt, just to |
| 23 |
make sure. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Dale |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
:-) :-) |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives