Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Tom H <tomh0665@×××××.com>
To: Gentoo User <gentoo-user@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall?
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2018 17:58:52
Message-Id: CAOdo=Sx59s9Dtqjq7agU8tZB5bDkwbSvksa+hF4yyE1VXnMEpg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall? by Walter Dnes
1 On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org> wrote:
2 >
3 > Is there something besides iptables? It seems to be like
4 > systemd/perl/python, continuously expanding its scope. And no, I'm not
5 > looking for an "easy-peasy front-end gui" that'll probably pull in 90%
6 > of QT as dependancies. I fondly remember IPCHAINS.
7
8 iptables doesn't depend on systemd, perl, or python.
9
10 firewalld depends on dbus, polkit, and python.
11
12 ufw depends on python.
13
14 But there may be other iptables frontends that depend on more,
15 especially if they are graphical.
16
17 The advantage of iptables frontends is that you only have to allow
18 "your" ports (for a minimal customization) without having to worry
19 about all the other stuff that you need to set up when you use
20 iptables directly.
21
22 I've used apf, arno, and ufw. The first two depend on bash and simply
23 require you to set variables in "/etc/$firewall/".

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] [SUSPECTED SPAM] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall? Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
[gentoo-user] [OT] Best *SIMPLE* firewall? Walter Dnes <waltdnes@××××××××.org>