1 |
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, hw <hw@×××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> Every three months is not infrequently. |
4 |
> |
5 |
>... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Seriously, update every day? |
8 |
> |
9 |
|
10 |
As Neil has mentioned, there seems to be a mismatch in expectations. |
11 |
Every day updates are probably fairly typical for Gentoo users. I |
12 |
don't update all my containers every day, but a typical container is |
13 |
@system, a few convenience applications (screen, vim, atop, etckeeper, |
14 |
cfg-update, nullmailer), and a single real application. And those get |
15 |
updated monthly (and from having updated my host daily issues that |
16 |
come up tend to be repeats). |
17 |
|
18 |
By Gentoo standards updates every three months is fairly infrequently. |
19 |
And the system you're having issues with at the moment is a few times |
20 |
older than that. |
21 |
|
22 |
Remember, this isn't a binary distro where the only thing you need |
23 |
working to do an upgrade is tar, gzip, and stuff like glibc. Gentoo |
24 |
updates require working build systems and those tend to be fussy. The |
25 |
list of dependencies is MUCH larger, and when you factor in USE flags |
26 |
the configuration space is huge. This makes portage slower than a |
27 |
typical binary package manager, and updates are more failure-prone. |
28 |
|
29 |
If you want something that "just works" I fully get that, but it just |
30 |
isn't Gentoo. Our developers and most of our users would not want to |
31 |
sacrifice some tweakability just to make emerge die less often. |
32 |
|
33 |
I do sympathize that the other distros aren't quite meeting your |
34 |
needs. Gentoo can do just about anything, but it comes at the cost of |
35 |
tinkering. It sounds like you want Arch minus systemd, but you'll |
36 |
probably need to start your own distro for that. Unfortunately |
37 |
distros require a certain critical mass and there are only so many |
38 |
permutations of the binary distros out there. |
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Rich |