1 |
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 06:36:16PM +0200, wabenbau@×××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> Frank Steinmetzger <Warp_7@×××.de> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > I thought about getting a wide-gamut display, namely a Dell with |
5 |
> > rgb-LEDs, but in the end decided against it because its quality seems |
6 |
> |
7 |
> But if you buy online, you always have the option to send back a |
8 |
> unsatisfactory product. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> > to fluctuate a lot. And while I do some photography, I don’t do it |
11 |
> > professionally or deal with printing. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> A wide gamut monitor is a great thing even if you don't need it for |
14 |
> softproofing. I shot a lot of colorful photos (e.g. from bugs, blossoms |
15 |
> and live concerts with colored limelights). They look great on an |
16 |
> AdobeRGB monitor but much more "boring" on a standard monitor. |
17 |
|
18 |
If the monitor is the only means of looking at the photos and the photos are |
19 |
the only reason for the monitor, then it’s not enough for me (right now |
20 |
anyway). And as far as I read, watching movies on a wide gamut will not be a |
21 |
very good experience, as those are tuned to look good on “normal” displays, |
22 |
resulting in much oversaturated colours. |
23 |
|
24 |
> I also thought about buying an Eizo. But they are very pricy. An |
25 |
> Eizo without wide gamut, without factory calibration and without 16bit |
26 |
> LUT hardware calibration costs more as my Samsung with all these |
27 |
> features. Maybe the Eizo is more reliable over the years, but who knows. |
28 |
|
29 |
I used to buy Samsung, but I don't like how they treat their customers in |
30 |
recent times, so they are on my no-buy list (same as Sony). And I do have a |
31 |
knack for buying more pricey stuff if it’s worth the quality. It gives me a |
32 |
feeling of “mine’s better than yours”. :o) Sure, I don’t quite like the lack |
33 |
of connections and features on the Eizo (such as picture-in-picture or |
34 |
HDMI), but I do like their appearance (no gloss, no touch buttons, no wobbly |
35 |
stand). |
36 |
|
37 |
> Try out an Spider4. You can buy it as a new device for about 75€. Test |
38 |
> the results on your monitors and when you are not satisfied, just send |
39 |
> it back. No risk at all. |
40 |
|
41 |
I’m also not a big fan of that (buying and sending back). Especially if you |
42 |
buy it for a purpose and only then find out it’s not adequate or downright |
43 |
broken. While it’s convenient, it produces a climate of “it’s normal that |
44 |
what you buy may be crap and you’ll have to try again”. It gives |
45 |
manufacturers the freedom to cut even more corners without anyone |
46 |
complaints from the consumers. And it’s ecological absurdity on all ends, |
47 |
considering how toxic electronic manufacturing is. |
48 |
|
49 |
This is also why I put a lot of time and energy into research before I |
50 |
purchase something pricey. For instance, I read in hardware forums and |
51 |
through reviews for many weeks before I finally decided on all components |
52 |
of my PC that I assembled last year. I didn’t want to get into a situation |
53 |
that would force me to return something, b/c there is also risk involved - |
54 |
the extra expense, parts break during shipping, or problems with the |
55 |
retailer. I can’t be bothered with the hassle. |
56 |
|
57 |
OK I noticed this has become more of a political manifesto. So I’m gonna |
58 |
stop here. :) |
59 |
|
60 |
-- |
61 |
Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’ |
62 |
Please do not share anything from, with or about me on any social network. |
63 |
|
64 |
Experience is a handy thing. Sadly, you only gain it after you needed it. |