1 |
On Monday 24 April 2006 02:42 pm, Abhay Kedia wrote: |
2 |
> On Sunday 23 April 2006 11:36, lordsauronthegreat@×××××.com wrote: |
3 |
> > through KGPG. The problem is that the GnuPG agent in the x86 area is |
4 |
> > version 1.4.2.2, yet KMail demands verison 1.9 |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The main problem is that gpg-agent has been "Package Masked" in favour of |
7 |
> gnupg-1.9.20-r1. So KMail demands next best alternative i.e. the keyword |
8 |
> masked gnupg-1.9.20. Just add it to your package.keywords and install it. |
9 |
> It is not causing any problems :) |
10 |
|
11 |
Call me stringent or just plain old a software Nazi, but for me if it doesn't |
12 |
work out-of-the-box something more needs to be done. Well, don't always |
13 |
listen to me on these things... my development group has a motto: "Nothing |
14 |
less than perfection." |
15 |
|
16 |
I don't like ultra-configuring things, though I don't mind it personally. |
17 |
However, to remain marketable, you do have to make sure that there is a way |
18 |
to do things without sending your user through a massive quest for the Holy |
19 |
Grail to make their email client work! |
20 |
|
21 |
I'm not mad, just rather surprised (I wasn't expecting something like this). |
22 |
Guess I've been spoiled by Debian's (horrifyingly stale) Stable distro. You |
23 |
find new stuff there about once every heavenly visitation, whether you need |
24 |
it or not. ; ) |