1 |
Mick <michaelkintzios <at> gmail.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
> Google has many examples and step-by-step instructions for configuring Outlook |
5 |
> to use SSL Certs (S/MIME), usually by the purveyors of all these expensive |
6 |
> certificate services: |
7 |
|
8 |
> http://www.globalsign.com/support/personal-certificate/per_outlook07.html |
9 |
|
10 |
Hello Mick, |
11 |
|
12 |
Exactly what I was looking for. Not just the part I included, but |
13 |
your entire answer. Gmane get'[s fussy about including too much |
14 |
previous text in responses. Sure, I've set up numerous email clients, |
15 |
like Thunderbird and such on doze systems before (encryption or not); that's |
16 |
a no-brainer. Outlook in a rigid corporate environment without the |
17 |
admin's help on that side..... interesting. If their spam filters |
18 |
are too aggressive, it will most likely quarantine the incoming encrypted |
19 |
files. A program of encryption, but makes files look like text to |
20 |
spam filters, would be keen, but most likely crackable, due to the |
21 |
limited char_set? Never tried this but hey, there is ALWAYS a way |
22 |
to "skin the cat"....... |
23 |
|
24 |
But I have never tried to help an ordinary Outlook user get encryption working, |
25 |
so as to exchange encrypted email, with their linux bretheran without their |
26 |
Admin's involvement. Most admins at corps do not care, but they are understaffed |
27 |
and only support what they support. So you have articulated some options where I |
28 |
can help a generic corporate user setup and use encryption, without their |
29 |
admin's involvement, which I guess is what I did not clearly explain in previous |
30 |
posts, as the goal all along, using Outlook or other |
31 |
MS based applications. |
32 |
|
33 |
THANKS; for sharing your knowledge and view of the landscape. |
34 |
I've got it from here. |
35 |
|
36 |
James |