| 1 |
On 03/01/2014 09:25, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am 03.01.2014 07:52, schrieb Alan McKinnon: |
| 3 |
>> On 03/01/2014 00:46, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> BFQ only for the SSDs ? |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Yes. The scheduler knows how to deal with SSDs while keeping everything |
| 7 |
>> responsive even under load. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> BFQ seems a good fit for your workcase - desktop/laptop. For those, |
| 10 |
>> interactive performance is the most important thing. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> So you set BFQ for the SSDs and CFQ for the hdds ? I have both in my |
| 13 |
> desktop. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
BFQ for both is the recommendation. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
But do try it both ways to see how it performs and compare. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Alan McKinnon |
| 25 |
alan.mckinnon@×××××.com |
Archives