| 1 |
Joerg Schilling ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> Daniel Iliev <daniel.iliev@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>> I'll be as direct as possible. Please, do the same. |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> I've read your site but I could not find the info I'm looking for. |
| 8 |
>> Please, quote the following two lines and provide the relevant text |
| 9 |
>> under each of them. |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> ==================== |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> Line 1: Why do you think there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL? |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> ==================== |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> Line 2: Full quotation of the lawyers' conclusion |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> ==================== |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Why do you start a new round and why are you now asking for completely |
| 22 |
> different things? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
He's not asking different things. |
| 25 |
Quotes from his mail: |
| 26 |
" - When you changed the license. For what reason. Explain, please, why |
| 27 |
there is no problem to mix GPL with CDDL (for me personally it is the |
| 28 |
most interesting part)" |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
" - The exact statement of the lawyers you consulted" |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Now, if you want to be taken seriously, please answer to these |
| 33 |
questions. We have asked them several times. Why do you dance around |
| 34 |
them and never answer them? They should be very easy to answer, if your |
| 35 |
position is so solid. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
> Did you read the GPL to understand what the GPL allows? |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> No non-GPL source is based on or derived from GPL code. |
| 40 |
> |
| 41 |
> If you claim that there is a problem, it would be _you_ who needs to prove this |
| 42 |
> claim. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
What do you not understand of the word "explain", Joerg? |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
m. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
-- |
| 49 |
gentoo-user@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives