1 |
* Alan Mackenzie <acm@×××.de> [24.01.2013. @11:25:45 +0000]: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Hi, Gentoo! |
4 |
> |
5 |
> A couple of days ago, I merged firefox-17.0.2 and ran revdep-rebuild -p. |
6 |
> It said, strangely, that some firefox libraries needed rebuilding. |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I've just let revdep-rebuild rebuild firefox. I run revdep-rebuild -p |
9 |
> again, and it's still saying these libraries need rebuilding. This |
10 |
> isn't good. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Here's some output from revdep-rebuild -p: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> * Checking dynamic linking consistency |
15 |
> [ 100% ] |
16 |
> * broken /usr/lib64/firefox/libxpcom.so (no version information available) |
17 |
> * broken /usr/lib64/firefox/plugin-container (no version information available) |
18 |
> * broken /usr/lib64/firefox/sdk/bin/xpcshell (no version information available) |
19 |
> * broken /usr/lib64/firefox/sdk/lib/libxpcom.so (no version information available) |
20 |
> * Generated new 3_broken.rr |
21 |
> * Assigning files to packages |
22 |
> * /usr/lib64/firefox/libxpcom.so -> www-client/firefox |
23 |
> * /usr/lib64/firefox/plugin-container -> www-client/firefox |
24 |
> * /usr/lib64/firefox/sdk/bin/xpcshell -> www-client/firefox |
25 |
> * /usr/lib64/firefox/sdk/lib/libxpcom.so -> www-client/firefox |
26 |
> |
27 |
> The problem seems to be the "no version information available". |
28 |
> revdep-rebuild is now less useful than it should be. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Has anybody else encountered this problem, and what is the best way to |
31 |
> solve it? |
32 |
> |
33 |
> -- |
34 |
> Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany). |
35 |
|
36 |
Hi, |
37 |
|
38 |
I also had this problem: it was due to the fact I had an old version of |
39 |
xulrunner installed on my computer. |
40 |
To address the problem, I only removed xulrunner : |
41 |
rm -Rf /usr/lib/xulrunner-* |
42 |
|
43 |
But I think that it would have been better to clean it by using : |
44 |
emerge -aC xulrunner |
45 |
|
46 |
Hope it will solve your infinite revdep-rebuild loop, |
47 |
|
48 |
JC |