1 |
On Tuesday 06 February 2007, Andrey Gerasimenko wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2007 10:27:01 +0300, Alan McKinnon |
3 |
> |
4 |
> <alan@××××××××××××××××.za> wrote: |
5 |
> > .... |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> Does the host CPU make a difference? I thought it was all |
8 |
> >> emulated? I tried to recompile the kernel with the generic '386 |
9 |
> >> CPU settings and removed all power mgmt etc, and the same issue |
10 |
> >> happens. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > The host CPU shouldn't make a difference as a VMWare .vmx is |
13 |
> > supposed to work the same on all hosts. However, the VMWare version |
14 |
> > in use on your friend's machine might be broken on AMD, or he has |
15 |
> > done something dumb. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> No, it does make difference. The guest OS uses the same CPU as the |
18 |
> host, with the exception of the number of available cores. If there |
19 |
> are 2 or more cores on the host, including virtual ones through |
20 |
> multithreading, the guest may use 1 or 2 cores. If the host has only |
21 |
> one core, the guest must be configured to use only one. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
Ah, this does make sense. |
25 |
|
26 |
Daevid, you say you use a P4,a nd your friend is AMD. Does he perhaps |
27 |
have an AMD64 or AMD dual core machine? |
28 |
|
29 |
alan |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Optimists say the glass is half full, |
33 |
Pessimists say the glass is half empty, |
34 |
Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? |
35 |
|
36 |
Alan McKinnon |
37 |
alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za |
38 |
+27 82, double three seven, one nine three five |
39 |
-- |
40 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |