| 1 |
On 05/06/14 15:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/05/2014 08:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 05/06/14 14:39, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 06/04/2014 08:02 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> Gentoo doesn't have write access to ::mate-overlay, it's completely |
| 6 |
>>>> unofficial |
| 7 |
>>>> Gentoo developers are just as much users as you are for ::mate-overlay |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> Enough said |
| 10 |
>>>> |
| 11 |
>>>> - Samuli |
| 12 |
>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Sorry, but this isn't just a MATE overlay problem. Once I made your |
| 15 |
>>> suggested changes, the MATE "mask change" requests disappeared. What I |
| 16 |
>>> did get was XFCE mask requirements: |
| 17 |
>>> |
| 18 |
>>> [snip] |
| 19 |
>>> |
| 20 |
>>> The following mask changes are necessary to proceed: |
| 21 |
>>> (see "package.unmask" in the portage(5) man page for more details) |
| 22 |
>>> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 |
| 23 |
>>> # required by @selected |
| 24 |
>>> # required by @world (argument) |
| 25 |
>>> # /etc/portage/package.mask: |
| 26 |
>>> # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils |
| 27 |
>>> =xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1 |
| 28 |
>>> # required by virtual/udev-208-r2 |
| 29 |
>>> # required by sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 |
| 30 |
>>> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1[udev] |
| 31 |
>>> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 |
| 32 |
>>> # required by @selected |
| 33 |
>>> # required by @world (argument) |
| 34 |
>>> # /etc/portage/package.mask: |
| 35 |
>>> # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils |
| 36 |
>>> =sys-apps/systemd-212-r5 |
| 37 |
>>> # required by sys-apps/systemd-212-r5[-vanilla] |
| 38 |
>>> # required by sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r3 |
| 39 |
>>> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-session-4.10.1-r1[udev] |
| 40 |
>>> # required by xfce-base/xfce4-meta-4.10 |
| 41 |
>>> # required by @selected |
| 42 |
>>> # required by @world (argument) |
| 43 |
>>> # /etc/portage/package.mask: |
| 44 |
>>> # problems with systemd, upower shift to upower.pm.utils |
| 45 |
>>> =sys-apps/gentoo-systemd-integration-4 |
| 46 |
>>> |
| 47 |
>>> [snip] |
| 48 |
>>> |
| 49 |
>>> I had already <emerge - C>'d those two XFCE applications because, early |
| 50 |
>>> in this process an <equery depends upower> had shown them to be |
| 51 |
>>> dependent upon "upower" even after emerging "upower-pm-utils." I have |
| 52 |
>>> no confidence at this point that my particular problem is reasonably |
| 53 |
>>> solvable, as I have been caught in this circle for three days now. |
| 54 |
>>> |
| 55 |
>> There is no need to mask any Xfce packages, in fact, masking them would |
| 56 |
>> cause more blockers. |
| 57 |
>> So that output would be bogus, as it would include the wrong Xfce masks, |
| 58 |
>> and futhermore it's only end of |
| 59 |
>> the output, so it wouldn't tell the necessary information required for |
| 60 |
>> solving it anyway. |
| 61 |
>> Remove anykind of Xfce masks and post complete output, and don't forget |
| 62 |
>> to use the --tree flag (-t) to see |
| 63 |
>> what is pulling in what. |
| 64 |
>> That is, if you still want help solving the issue. |
| 65 |
>> |
| 66 |
>> - Samuli |
| 67 |
>> |
| 68 |
>> |
| 69 |
> I I've removed the XFCE masks. Note that mate-power-manager is masked. |
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
I see you didn't follow the recommendation of getting rid of the |
| 72 |
::mate-overlay because |
| 73 |
I'm still seeing mate-base/mate::mate-overlay and more in the output |
| 74 |
I don't know how we could possible get forward if you don't follow-up on |
| 75 |
the already |
| 76 |
suggested instructions, no wonder you've been running circles. |
| 77 |
|
| 78 |
Uninstall mate-overlay, emerge -C mate mate-power-manager |
| 79 |
mate-session-manager and |
| 80 |
anything else you have installed from there. Let Portage pull them back |
| 81 |
in from the actual |
| 82 |
Portage tree. |
Archives