Re: [gentoo-user] Threads changing Was: OT: website design

[David W Noon]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA1



On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:06:00 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote about "Re:

[gentoo-user] Threads changing  Was: OT: website design":



>On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:22:00 David W Noon wrote:
>> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:10:02 +0200, Dale wrote about Re:
>> [gentoo-user] Threads changing  Was: OT: website design:
>
>[...]
>
>> Not a problem.  In fact, it is not I (or Indi) who is causing the
>> breakage.
>
>[...]
>
>> I hope all is clear now.
>
>This one is also shown as a reply to Indi. Coincidence?


No.  These headers, from my message, indicate why:



In-Reply-To: <h0rbj-6tn-13@×××××××××××××.it>

References: <h0nU6-PO-13@×××××××××××××.it>

	<h0o3M-1jx-13@×××××××××××××.it>

	<h0qRX-61E-1@×××××××××××××.it>

	<h0rbj-6tn-13@×××××××××××××.it>



The message id's were still being munged by the rogue NNTP server, so

your MUA is attempting to rebuild the thread structure based on

Subject: and Date: header lines.  It seems Claws on my system and KMail

on your system do things differently, so KMail is attaching my reply to

Mick's message erroneously, whereas Claws attached it correctly (here)

to Mick's message.



You should see this reply correctly threaded to your message, provided

you are not reading the mailing list through Usenet downstream from

the bofh.it server.

- -- 

Regards,



Dave  [RLU #314465]

======================================================================

dwnoon@××××××××.com (David W Noon)

======================================================================

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)



iEYEARECAAYFAk30rUgACgkQRQ2Fs59Psv8d7QCdHgabWKY7/Ytvdyw2y4oP8pIX

DasAn2lBO9OPn8PI74tUtqiGCIq+cVun

=ugjt

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----