| 1 |
On Jan 9, 2013 10:41 PM, "Holger Hoffstaette" < |
| 2 |
holger.hoffstaette@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 14:48:33 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > On 2013-01-09, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:47:07 +0000 (UTC) |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> >> The data on a medium can corrupt, and it can corrupt silently for a |
| 10 |
long |
| 11 |
> >> time. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > And I'm saying I've never seen that happen. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Well, that's the point. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> http://storagemojo.com/2007/09/19/cerns-data-corruption-research/ |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Things are much worse than you think. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> -h |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
But that link also shows a bright light: RAID arrays are in general more |
| 25 |
reliable, with BER less than one-third their spec. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Rgds, |
| 28 |
-- |
Archives