1 |
Mmm ... what are you trying to achieve here? |
2 |
|
3 |
a) /usr/share/js isn't served by any of our standard webserver installs; |
4 |
files you place in here aren't downloadable |
5 |
b) web-based apps will expect the javascript libraries to sit in a |
6 |
specific location under the htdocs directory |
7 |
c) different web-based apps will ship different versions of javascript |
8 |
libraries |
9 |
d) sooner or later, web-based apps will ship javascript libraries with |
10 |
their own modifications. we already get that behaviour with apps that |
11 |
ship bundled PEAR packages. |
12 |
e) The Gentoo philosophy is to remain as close to upstream as possible. |
13 |
Because we're a meta-distribution, and not a traditional distribution |
14 |
like Red Hat, the only time we try and change what UPSTREAM does is when |
15 |
we absolutely have to. |
16 |
|
17 |
I don't think we need to do anything here. |
18 |
|
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Stu |
21 |
|
22 |
-----Original Message----- |
23 |
From: Gunnar Wrobel [mailto:wrobel@g.o] |
24 |
Sent: 23 February 2006 06:44 |
25 |
To: gentoo-web-user@l.g.o |
26 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-web-user] Java Script Libraries |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
>> I came across a php based webapp that includes a number of third |
30 |
party |
31 |
>> java script libraries (including MochiKit). Do we currently have any |
32 |
>> standardized way of handling such libraries? |
33 |
>> |
34 |
>> Are there any other webapps that include java script libraries? |
35 |
> |
36 |
> Not that I'm aware of. |
37 |
> |
38 |
|
39 |
Ok, then I'll just open up /usr/share/js and add a small eclass |
40 |
comparable to php-lib.eclass. |
41 |
|
42 |
-- |
43 |
Gunnar Wrobel Gentoo Developer |
44 |
__________________C_o_n_t_a_c_t__________________ |
45 |
|
46 |
Mail: wrobel@g.o |
47 |
WWW: http://www.gunnarwrobel.de |
48 |
IRC: #gentoo-web at freenode.org |
49 |
_________________________________________________ |
50 |
|
51 |
-- |
52 |
gentoo-web-user@g.o mailing list |