Gentoo Archives: gentoo-web-user

From: Wendall Cada <wendallc@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-web-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-web-user] Upstream requirements for web-apps
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:57:33
Message-Id: 1137365797.9783.104.camel@www.toruslaptop.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-web-user] Upstream requirements for web-apps by Renat Lumpau
1 On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 22:43 +0000, Renat Lumpau wrote:
2 > I agree that in _this particular instance_ this isn't the best way to attract
3 > devs. Still, the dev quiz isn't _that_ hard. You are not expected to know in
4 > great detail how autotools works, for example. I think the point is that all
5 > devs have a baseline understanding of how the _whole_ thing works, not just
6 > their dusty corner of the tree. This ML isn't read by recruiters, however. They
7 > (and the council) will have final say, not us.
8
9 Yeah, sorry if I made it sound if it was hard. It's really been a time
10 issue for me lately. I meant to focus on the attaction aspect.
11
12 > I actually prefer to have w-c separately. For me, dealing with wrobel is much
13 > easier than working with carpaski/ferringb/whoever, simply because we can fix
14 > and release much more quickly than if we were part of Portage.
15 >
16 Agreed on the portage issue, as unfortanate as that is.
17
18 > And then there's the issue of distro independence and plans for world
19 > domination, but that should be directed to vhost-tools-dev :)
20 >
21 +1 for world domination. :)
22
23 Wendall
24
25 --
26 gentoo-web-user@g.o mailing list