Gentoo Archives: gentoo-web-user

From: Wendall Cada <wendallc@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-web-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-web-user] Upstream requirements for web-apps
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:57:33
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-web-user] Upstream requirements for web-apps by Renat Lumpau
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 22:43 +0000, Renat Lumpau wrote:
> I agree that in _this particular instance_ this isn't the best way to attract > devs. Still, the dev quiz isn't _that_ hard. You are not expected to know in > great detail how autotools works, for example. I think the point is that all > devs have a baseline understanding of how the _whole_ thing works, not just > their dusty corner of the tree. This ML isn't read by recruiters, however. They > (and the council) will have final say, not us.
Yeah, sorry if I made it sound if it was hard. It's really been a time issue for me lately. I meant to focus on the attaction aspect.
> I actually prefer to have w-c separately. For me, dealing with wrobel is much > easier than working with carpaski/ferringb/whoever, simply because we can fix > and release much more quickly than if we were part of Portage. >
Agreed on the portage issue, as unfortanate as that is.
> And then there's the issue of distro independence and plans for world > domination, but that should be directed to vhost-tools-dev :) >
+1 for world domination. :) Wendall -- gentoo-web-user@g.o mailing list