Re: [gnap-dev] State of the union

[josé Alberto Suárez López]

Hi,

thanks for your work :) so please next time confirm things like this
with me, in the last email i told you i was creating the repository and
than i will wait last week for a reply about the name. I was creating
this morning the new repository when i readed your email.

El dom, 25-05-2008 a las 14:47 +0200, Philipp Riegger escribió:
> Hi everybody!
>
> We just created gnap-dev on Google Code:
> http://code.google.com/p/gnap-dev/
> So please drop us (Andrey or me) a line and we will add you to the
> project.
>
> Furthermore we added gnap-dev as email address where all svn commits
> will be sent. This is ok, i guess, because this is a development list.
> And it is too much overhead to create an extra list for that. I filed a
> bug to get these messages whitelisted:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223551
>
> Next thing: I'd like to reorganize the repository and the ebuilds. I
> would like to split it the other way around than they are at the moment.
> I'd like to have:
>
> A) One ebuild called gnap, that installes all gnap_* scripts,
> documentation and examples.
>
> B) ebuilds of the form gnap-x86-uclibc, gnap-x86-glibc,
> gnap-x86-uclibc-hardened,... for each target we support containing a
> seedstage, build gnap base fs, maybe prebuilt extensions and the portage
> snapshot. We could controll the installation of prebuild extensions,
> prebuilt base fs and maybe other stuff with USE-flags. We could also
> split the portage snapshot into an extra ebuild in case multiple targets
> share the same one.
>
> A should have regular version numbers, like 2.0, 2.1, whatever, B should
> only have dates as version.
>
> Comments?
>
> Thanks,
> 	Philipp
>
>
>

-- 
gnap-dev@l.g.o mailing list