Gentoo Archives: gnap-dev

From: Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de>
To: gnap-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gnap-dev] State of the union
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 12:47:58
Message-Id: 1211719664.23566.7.camel@troy.riegger.name
1 Hi everybody!
2
3 We just created gnap-dev on Google Code:
4 http://code.google.com/p/gnap-dev/
5 So please drop us (Andrey or me) a line and we will add you to the
6 project.
7
8 Furthermore we added gnap-dev as email address where all svn commits
9 will be sent. This is ok, i guess, because this is a development list.
10 And it is too much overhead to create an extra list for that. I filed a
11 bug to get these messages whitelisted:
12 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=223551
13
14 Next thing: I'd like to reorganize the repository and the ebuilds. I
15 would like to split it the other way around than they are at the moment.
16 I'd like to have:
17
18 A) One ebuild called gnap, that installes all gnap_* scripts,
19 documentation and examples.
20
21 B) ebuilds of the form gnap-x86-uclibc, gnap-x86-glibc,
22 gnap-x86-uclibc-hardened,... for each target we support containing a
23 seedstage, build gnap base fs, maybe prebuilt extensions and the portage
24 snapshot. We could controll the installation of prebuild extensions,
25 prebuilt base fs and maybe other stuff with USE-flags. We could also
26 split the portage snapshot into an extra ebuild in case multiple targets
27 share the same one.
28
29 A should have regular version numbers, like 2.0, 2.1, whatever, B should
30 only have dates as version.
31
32 Comments?
33
34 Thanks,
35 Philipp
36
37
38
39 --
40 gnap-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gnap-dev] State of the union "josé Alberto Suárez López" <bass@g.o>