Gentoo Archives: gnap-dev

From: Philipp Riegger <lists@××××××××××××.de>
To: gnap-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gnap-dev] [PATCH 0/4] GNAP improvements, probably for 2.1
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:08:37
Message-Id: 1186149463.10651.56.camel@b136a
In Reply to: [gnap-dev] [PATCH 0/4] GNAP improvements, probably for 2.1 by Philipp Riegger
On Fri, 2007-08-03 at 16:16 +0300, Philipp Riegger wrote:
> Things that still need to be done: > - Make the portage tarball creation code of gnap_make nicer. Since > catalyst supports overlays, this is probably the way to go: Use the > unmodified potage snapshot and merge all given overlays into one > overlay > and give it to catalyst. Maybe catalyst can even handle more than one > overlay, but i do not know since i did not have a look at this. > - Lots of code is still duplicated in there and could be put to > functions. I espcially mean gnap_make and the stage-specific code. > - This patchset works on the scripts, mostly n gnap_make and only > does > minimal changes to the provided config files. Maybe the gnap-devver > convigfiles have to be changed accordingly, someone should have a look > at the patches and theese files.
- I was planign to have a look at a test set for gnap_make this would do the following: - Create a test for every error patch (gtest $?, gdie) to look i they are triggered corrrectly and if the output is right. - Create a test case that builds every possible stage with an empty storedir (possibly 1 test per stage). - Weekly builds with the gnap tree/a tree snapshot from upstream. Philipp -- gnap-dev@g.o mailing list