From: | Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | tenshi-user@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [tenshi-user] tenshi timestamp | ||
Date: | Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:55:21 | ||
Message-Id: | 20050614195251.GZ3960@sole.infis.univ.trieste.it | ||
In Reply to: | [tenshi-user] tenshi timestamp by Helge Aksdal |
1 | On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:52:05PM +0200, Helge Aksdal wrote: |
2 | > hi, |
3 | > |
4 | > there are some posts on the gentoo forum[1] regarding tenshi |
5 | > timestamps. would it be possible to add a config option to |
6 | > enable/disable timestamps on the logs in the upcoming 0.3.4 release? |
7 | > |
8 | > [1] |
9 | > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-347181-highlight-tenshi.html?sid=8a45220b57fb57d9d5d3a9159c9812c8 |
10 | > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-320389-highlight-tenshi.html?sid=8a45220b57fb57d9d5d3a9159c9812c8 |
11 | |
12 | Tenshi summarizes log lines so unless there's only 1 log message per match |
13 | this is pointless, and even in that case if you care about timestamps then |
14 | tenshi is not the right tool for you. |
15 | |
16 | Clearly timestamps are lost when doing summarization. We *could* print ranges |
17 | (like last message - first message) but still I don't see the point in that. |
18 | |
19 | Take a look at X-tenshi-report-start header in the messages, that tells you a |
20 | clue about the timeframe. |
21 | |
22 | -- |
23 | Andrea Barisani <lcars@g.o> .*. |
24 | Gentoo Linux Infrastructure Developer V |
25 | ( ) |
26 | GPG-Key 0x864C9B9E http://dev.gentoo.org/~lcars/pubkey.asc ( ) |
27 | 0A76 074A 02CD E989 CE7F AC3F DA47 578E 864C 9B9E ^^_^^ |
28 | "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate" |
29 | -- |
30 | tenshi-user@g.o mailing list |