1 |
On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 21:56 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
2 |
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
3 |
> > On 02-12-2008 14:16:28 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
4 |
> > > |
5 |
> > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 10:18 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
6 |
> > > > On 02-12-2008 08:58:23 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
7 |
> > > > > > > Recommended way ?? |
8 |
> > > > > > |
9 |
> > > > > > !m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
10 |
> > > > > |
11 |
> > > > > What if simply not keywording sys-devel/libperl - or p.masking, and then |
12 |
> > > > > doing: |
13 |
> > > > > |
14 |
> > > > > ( sys-devel/libperl || dev-lang/perl ) |
15 |
> > > > |
16 |
> > > > isn't it perl itself that depends on libperl? |
17 |
> > > |
18 |
> > > Yes, but that is irrelevant here. |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > This is meant for packages needing the perl-library only - preferrably |
21 |
> > > shared (from sys-devel/libperl), or static (from dev-lang/perl) on MiNT. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Do those exist? That is the most imporant here. Because then you need |
24 |
> > something like: |
25 |
> > || ( sys-devel/libperl m68k-mint? ( dev-lang/perl ) ) |
26 |
> > probably better: |
27 |
> > !m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
28 |
> > m68k-mint? ( dev-lang/perl) |
29 |
> > |
30 |
> > yeah, ugly, so the final solution highly depends on how often this is |
31 |
> > going to be necessary. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> In mainline portage there's less than 10 packages that use |
34 |
> sys-devel/perl. |
35 |
> |
36 |
> So shall I stick.... |
37 |
> |
38 |
> !m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
39 |
> |
40 |
> in the dev-lang/perl ebuild as in the attached ebuild patch ? |
41 |
> |
42 |
> Let me have any other comments on this too, and once it's o.k.ed I'll |
43 |
> send the actual perl-5.8.8-mint.patch too. |
44 |
|
45 |
Ooops, that was the wrong patch. Use this one for comments.... |
46 |
|
47 |
Alan. |