| 1 |
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 14:59 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02-12-2008 14:16:28 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > |
| 4 |
> > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 10:18 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > On 02-12-2008 08:58:23 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > > > Recommended way ?? |
| 7 |
> > > > > |
| 8 |
> > > > > !m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
| 9 |
> > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > What if simply not keywording sys-devel/libperl - or p.masking, and then |
| 11 |
> > > > doing: |
| 12 |
> > > > |
| 13 |
> > > > ( sys-devel/libperl || dev-lang/perl ) |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > isn't it perl itself that depends on libperl? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Yes, but that is irrelevant here. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > This is meant for packages needing the perl-library only - preferrably |
| 20 |
> > shared (from sys-devel/libperl), or static (from dev-lang/perl) on MiNT. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Do those exist? That is the most imporant here. Because then you need |
| 23 |
> something like: |
| 24 |
> || ( sys-devel/libperl m68k-mint? ( dev-lang/perl ) ) |
| 25 |
> probably better: |
| 26 |
> !m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
| 27 |
> m68k-mint? ( dev-lang/perl) |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> yeah, ugly, so the final solution highly depends on how often this is |
| 30 |
> going to be necessary. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
In mainline portage there's less than 10 packages that use |
| 33 |
sys-devel/perl. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
So shall I stick.... |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
!m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
in the dev-lang/perl ebuild as in the attached ebuild patch ? |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Let me have any other comments on this too, and once it's o.k.ed I'll |
| 42 |
send the actual perl-5.8.8-mint.patch too. |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Alan. |
Archives