1 |
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 20:27 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
2 |
> On 28-11-2008 10:57:18 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
3 |
> > On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 11:36 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
4 |
> > > On 28-11-2008 11:35:23 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: |
5 |
> > > > |
6 |
> > > > On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 09:13 +0000, Alan Hourihane wrote: |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > > > Eventually, sys-devel/libperl should generally be package.masked for |
9 |
> > > > > > FreeMiNT (as 'irrelevant', lol), or at least install nothing. |
10 |
> > > > > |
11 |
> > > > > I did try that a while ago, but it threw up lots of horrible problems |
12 |
> > > > > with DEPEND/RDEPEND. So what's the correct way to package.masked this to |
13 |
> > > > > install nothing ?? |
14 |
> > > > |
15 |
> > > > You could either package.provide it, or in the ebuild just 'return 0' in |
16 |
> > > > src_unpack(), src_compile() and src_install(). |
17 |
> > > > |
18 |
> > > > I'm not sure which one is more obvious, even with appropriate comments. |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > How about just dropping the depend on m68k-mint? |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> > Recommended way ?? |
23 |
> |
24 |
> !m68k-mint? ( sys-devel/libperl ) |
25 |
|
26 |
O.k, is this the recommended way over having sys-devel/libperl |
27 |
install /usr/lib/libperl.a ?? |
28 |
|
29 |
Alan. |