| 1 |
On 28-01-2017 12:34:58 +0900, Benda Xu wrote: |
| 2 |
> Very nice Fabian, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> writes: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I've just committed portage-2.3.2 to the tree. It seems to work fine(tm) |
| 7 |
> > sofar. One thing that will affect devs is that repoman is now shipped |
| 8 |
> > separately. You will have to emerge app-portage/repoman. Beware that |
| 9 |
> > this version of repoman does NOT come from the prefix branch of portage, |
| 10 |
> > e.g. it is exactly the same version as gx86 uses. I've successfully |
| 11 |
> > committed some packages with it, and found no problems, I consider this |
| 12 |
> > a GOOD thing ;) |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Does that mean the prefix branch of portage is eventually merged into |
| 15 |
> master? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Slowly, very slowly. I think Zac did an awesome job already adding |
| 18 |
Prefix support to master, but the prefix branch carries some legacy with |
| 19 |
it (like always supporting EPREFIX, also in older EAPIs) and some more. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
The merge from 2.2.28 to 2.3.3 went very smoothly, which was even a |
| 22 |
surprise for me :) |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Fabian |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 28 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives