Gentoo Archives: gentoo-alt

From: Bacchella Fabrice <fabrice.bacchella@×××××××.com>
To: gentoo-alt@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 12:15:16
Message-Id: DE8B410E-3BB1-4028-A149-9436DA15A54C@exalead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh by Fabian Groffen
Le 19 mai 08 à 14:08, Fabian Groffen a écrit :

> On 19-05-2008 14:06:41 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote: >> >> Le 19 mai 08 à 13:58, Fabian Groffen a écrit : >> >>> On 19-05-2008 13:55:12 +0200, Bacchella Fabrice wrote: >>>> bin/bash and bin/rbash are here, but not bin/sh. Everything else is >>>> fine. >>> >>> ok, then I have to figure out why symlinking fails. Will fix the >>> gcc >>> ebuilds later anyway. >>> >> I think the easiest and less brittle way is o create bin and sbin ? >> Is >> there a reason not to do that ? > > From your initial email I undestood that we actually create that dir, > and that it breaks. ??? Just creating $EPREFIX/bin and $EPREFIX/ > sbin is > fine with me, and a very little effort if it just fixes this > problem...
Oups, my explanation was not clear then. It's NOT creating it that is the problem.
> > > > -- > Fabian Groffen > Gentoo on a different level > -- > gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list >
-- gentoo-alt@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-alt] bug in bootstrap-prefix.sh Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o>