| 1 |
On 18-05-2009 10:39:44 +0200, Markus Duft wrote: |
| 2 |
> > Maybe this is something totally different, but doesn't the |
| 3 |
> > eclass/portage somewhere *remove* the executable bit of shared |
| 4 |
> > libraries? |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> hmm. have to look that up, but i guess what you mean is the handling |
| 7 |
> of .la files?. however it is strange because it is the _only_ .so that |
| 8 |
> is not executable. and of course non-executable shared libraries don't |
| 9 |
> work. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> i'd like to avoid a chmod a+x :) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Please check misc-functions.sh and isolated-functions.sh |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 18 |
Gentoo on a different level |
Archives