Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?

[Mark Knecht]

On 9/23/06, Greg Bur <greg.bur@×××××.com> wrote:
> On 9/22/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
> > On 9/22/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
> > > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> posted
> > > 5bdc1c8b0609221235i2270bbenf016d5fa7a1998ec@××××××××××.com, excerpted
> > > below, on  Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:35:47 -0700:
>
> > P.S. - I'm still curious about trying your compiler flags but now
> > there is no pressing timeframe to do it in on this machine. - MWK
> > --
>
> I put my workstation through its paces last weekend using Duncan's
> flags and so far I've only run across one package that gave me
> problems and that was Evolution.  It didn't like the
> LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,now"
>
> I can't really say if I've noticed a huge difference in performance
> because I use Windowmaker which is already pretty snappy but some of
> my apps such as Firefox seem to be a few steps quicker but that might
> all be in my head.  Altogether it took about 18 hours to recompile the
> whole mess and nothing fell apart other than a slight issue with
> Evolution.

Cool. So you did essentially the

emerge -e system
emerge -e system
emerge -e world

steps that you did when upgrading gcc to get there?

Thanks,
Mark
-- 
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list