Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: Greg Bur <greg.bur@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone?
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 09:57:56
Message-Id: 976cb44f0609230255s14bcc37dj36d53f90cbf765bc@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: SOLVED: gcc 4.1 upgrade - bad desktop interactivity anyone? by Mark Knecht
1 On 9/22/06, Mark Knecht <markknecht@×××××.com> wrote:
2 > On 9/22/06, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote:
3 > > "Mark Knecht" <markknecht@×××××.com> posted
4 > > 5bdc1c8b0609221235i2270bbenf016d5fa7a1998ec@××××××××××.com, excerpted
5 > > below, on Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:35:47 -0700:
6
7 > P.S. - I'm still curious about trying your compiler flags but now
8 > there is no pressing timeframe to do it in on this machine. - MWK
9 > --
10
11 I put my workstation through its paces last weekend using Duncan's
12 flags and so far I've only run across one package that gave me
13 problems and that was Evolution. It didn't like the
14 LDFLAGS="-Wl,-z,now"
15
16 I can't really say if I've noticed a huge difference in performance
17 because I use Windowmaker which is already pretty snappy but some of
18 my apps such as Firefox seem to be a few steps quicker but that might
19 all be in my head. Altogether it took about 18 hours to recompile the
20 whole mess and nothing fell apart other than a slight issue with
21 Evolution.
22 --
23 gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list

Replies