Gentoo Archives: gentoo-amd64

From: "Hemmann
To: gentoo-amd64@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of.
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 22:18:00
Message-Id: 200805310017.55820.volker.armin.hemmann@tu-clausthal.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. by David Leverton
1 On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
2 > On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
3 > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote:
4 > > oh really?
5 > >
6 > > I don't think so.
7 >
8 > You also "think" that
9 > * it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use
10 > chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the tree
11 > * package.mask syntax, that I explicitly stated was supported by Portage
12 > when I first mentioned it, is invalid
13 >
14 > Please forgive me if I don't find your li^W"opinions" very compelling.
15
16 you just call me liar - but you do nothing to prove that. On the mean time, I
17 gave you some links.
18
19 So, in my opinion, you are just a pro-paludis troll.
20
21 And from what I can see, trolls are the prefered audience and power behind
22 paludis.
23 --
24 gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-amd64] Re: KDE 4.0.4 upgrade, sort of. ionut cucu <cuciferus@×××××.com>