1 |
On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:58:59 -0400 |
2 |
"John P. Burkett" wrote - |
3 |
> Thank you, David. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> David Fellows wrote: |
6 |
> > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:55:15 -0400 |
7 |
> > "John P. Burkett" wrote - |
8 |
> >> Drake Donahue wrote: |
9 |
> >>> Burkett asked: |
10 |
> >>> |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > 2) find someone who still has the top level Makefile from 2.6.22-r2 who wil |
13 |
> l |
14 |
> > send it to you. And hope that that is all you are missing. |
15 |
> This appears to be the easiest short term solution. In looking for the |
16 |
> top level Makefile from 2.6.22-r2, do I need to specify that it is to be |
17 |
> used on an amd64 machine or should I expect that any such file might |
18 |
> work on amd64 architecture? |
19 |
|
20 |
The Makefile should be architecture independent. I guess you can download one |
21 |
of the 2.6.22 series of kerenl sources from |
22 |
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ |
23 |
unpack it somewhere and copy the Makefile. |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
There is a sequence of 2.6.22 kernels starting with 2.6.22 and proceeding |
27 |
2.6.22.1, 2.6.22.2, ... |
28 |
Which one of those correspods most closely to gentoo 2.6.22-r2 I don't know. |
29 |
Obviously those that come after the date (uname -a) that your kerenl was built |
30 |
are not of interest. |
31 |
|
32 |
Hmm. Just looked at my own Makefile again. It begins: |
33 |
|
34 |
VERSION = 2 |
35 |
PATCHLEVEL = 6 |
36 |
SUBLEVEL = 27 |
37 |
EXTRAVERSION = -gentoo-r8 |
38 |
NAME = Rotary Wombat |
39 |
|
40 |
my uname -a gives |
41 |
Linux kanga 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 ...... |
42 |
It is remotely possible that the driver install is just using the Makefile |
43 |
for the version info to compare it against the currently running kernel |
44 |
version. in which case you could try creating a Makefile that just contains |
45 |
the first four lines above that match your kerenl version. Probably you would drop the -osmp since that is "EXTRAEXTRAVERSION". |
46 |
|
47 |
The NAME value is likely irrelevant. |
48 |
|
49 |
It would be easy to try. And should do no harm if it fails. |
50 |
|
51 |
But you are using chewing gum and baling wire to fix this. |
52 |
|
53 |
Dave F |