Re: [gentoo-amd64] madwifi-ng not compile in amd64

[agtdino]

Hi, 


# eselect profile list
Available profile symlink targets:
  [1]   default-linux/amd64/2006.1 *
  [2]   default-linux/amd64/2006.1/desktop
  [3]   default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-symlinks
  [4]   default-linux/amd64/2006.1/no-multilib
  [5]   default-linux/amd64/2007.0
  [6]   default-linux/amd64/2007.0/desktop
  [7]   default-linux/amd64/2007.0/no-multilib
  [8]   default-linux/amd64/2007.0/server
  [9]   hardened/amd64
  [10]  hardened/amd64/multilib
  [11]  selinux/2007.0/amd64
  [12]  selinux/2007.0/amd64/hardened

#eselect profile set 6

And then - sos -

# emerge --update --deep --newuse --pretend --verbose world


Total: 478 packages (1 upgrade, 396 downgrades, 14 new, 1 in new slot,
66 reinstalls, 5 blocks), Size of downloads: 480,074 kB

so bad! :----(

perhaps with the 2Gb of ccache that I have saved could take this process
only one or 2 days. 

Thank's for the tip  


El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 11:22 +0000, Beso escribió:
> well, just removing ~amd64 from your make.conf and eselect profile set
> default-linux/amd64/2007.0 and then emerge -uDNvp will let you see
> what would compile.
> if you instead want to rebuild from scratch then funtoo has recent
> compiled stages that would let you not compile a lot of updated stuff.
>
> 2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@××××××××.es>:
>         Well, my system is uptime since for a long time and has many
>         updates
>         more than I belive!,, :D
>         For the moments is running well, I dont be a freek of gentoo
>         but when I
>         buy the amd64 system I had to make something hard step's to
>         startit,
>         perhaps it's not something clean and it's has profiles to the
>         pass.
>         I go to think in change this profile, or it reinstall from
>         scratch ( is
>         more fastest but the less interesting :( )
>
>         Thank's and regards
>
>         El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 09:56 +0000, Beso escribió:
>         > i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a
>         real
>         > gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set
>         to 2006.1
>         > makes me wonder if you really know what you're doing...
>         > someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses
>         the latest
>         > profile.
>         > i really think that you should update your profile (use
>         eselect
>         > profile to do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in
>         some months)
>         > and then compile at least the base system from the amd64
>         branch. then
>         > you could use gcc-4.2.2 and other things the way you want. i
>         > personally use a lot of unstable stuff, but the base system
>         is amd64
>         > and not ~amd64.
>         >
>         > 2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@××××××××.es>:
>         >         Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel
>         to
>         >         2.6.23-r6.
>         >
>         >         Regard's
>         >
>         >         El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev
>         Klimaszewski
>         >         escribió:
>         >         > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote:
>         >         > > Hi,
>         >         > Hi!
>         >         >
>         >         > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is
>         currently
>         >         incompatible (well
>         >         > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the
>         proper
>         >         fix) with
>         >         > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then
>         you will
>         >         need to
>         >         > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they
>         put out a
>         >         release
>         >         > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on
>         two
>         >         patches) that is
>         >         > compatible with 2.6.24.
>         >         >
>         >         > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is
>         absolutely
>         >         necessary, I
>         >         > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6
>         >         >
>         >         > -- Steev
>         >         >
>         >
>         >         --
>         >         gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > --
>         > dott. ing. beso
>
>         --
>         gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list
>
>
>
>
> --
> dott. ing. beso

-- 
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list