1 |
well, just removing ~amd64 from your make.conf and eselect profile set |
2 |
default-linux/amd64/2007.0 and then emerge -uDNvp will let you see what |
3 |
would compile. |
4 |
if you instead want to rebuild from scratch then funtoo has recent compiled |
5 |
stages that would let you not compile a lot of updated stuff. |
6 |
|
7 |
2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@××××××××.es>: |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Well, my system is uptime since for a long time and has many updates |
10 |
> more than I belive!,, :D |
11 |
> For the moments is running well, I dont be a freek of gentoo but when I |
12 |
> buy the amd64 system I had to make something hard step's to startit, |
13 |
> perhaps it's not something clean and it's has profiles to the pass. |
14 |
> I go to think in change this profile, or it reinstall from scratch ( is |
15 |
> more fastest but the less interesting :( ) |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Thank's and regards |
18 |
> |
19 |
> El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 09:56 +0000, Beso escribió: |
20 |
> > i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a real |
21 |
> > gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1 |
22 |
> > makes me wonder if you really know what you're doing... |
23 |
> > someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest |
24 |
> > profile. |
25 |
> > i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect |
26 |
> > profile to do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months) |
27 |
> > and then compile at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then |
28 |
> > you could use gcc-4.2.2 and other things the way you want. i |
29 |
> > personally use a lot of unstable stuff, but the base system is amd64 |
30 |
> > and not ~amd64. |
31 |
> > |
32 |
> > 2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@××××××××.es>: |
33 |
> > Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to |
34 |
> > 2.6.23-r6. |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> > Regard's |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski |
39 |
> > escribió: |
40 |
> > > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote: |
41 |
> > > > Hi, |
42 |
> > > Hi! |
43 |
> > > |
44 |
> > > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently |
45 |
> > incompatible (well |
46 |
> > > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper |
47 |
> > fix) with |
48 |
> > > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will |
49 |
> > need to |
50 |
> > > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a |
51 |
> > release |
52 |
> > > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two |
53 |
> > patches) that is |
54 |
> > > compatible with 2.6.24. |
55 |
> > > |
56 |
> > > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely |
57 |
> > necessary, I |
58 |
> > > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6 |
59 |
> > > |
60 |
> > > -- Steev |
61 |
> > > |
62 |
> > |
63 |
> > -- |
64 |
> > gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> > |
67 |
> > |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > -- |
70 |
> > dott. ing. beso |
71 |
> |
72 |
> -- |
73 |
> gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
74 |
> |
75 |
> |
76 |
|
77 |
|
78 |
-- |
79 |
dott. ing. beso |