| 1 |
Well, my system is uptime since for a long time and has many updates |
| 2 |
more than I belive!,, :D |
| 3 |
For the moments is running well, I dont be a freek of gentoo but when I |
| 4 |
buy the amd64 system I had to make something hard step's to startit, |
| 5 |
perhaps it's not something clean and it's has profiles to the pass. |
| 6 |
I go to think in change this profile, or it reinstall from scratch ( is |
| 7 |
more fastest but the less interesting :( ) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Thank's and regards |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 09:56 +0000, Beso escribió: |
| 12 |
> i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a real |
| 13 |
> gentoo poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1 |
| 14 |
> makes me wonder if you really know what you're doing... |
| 15 |
> someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest |
| 16 |
> profile. |
| 17 |
> i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect |
| 18 |
> profile to do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months) |
| 19 |
> and then compile at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then |
| 20 |
> you could use gcc-4.2.2 and other things the way you want. i |
| 21 |
> personally use a lot of unstable stuff, but the base system is amd64 |
| 22 |
> and not ~amd64. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@××××××××.es>: |
| 25 |
> Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to |
| 26 |
> 2.6.23-r6. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> Regard's |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski |
| 31 |
> escribió: |
| 32 |
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote: |
| 33 |
> > > Hi, |
| 34 |
> > Hi! |
| 35 |
> > |
| 36 |
> > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently |
| 37 |
> incompatible (well |
| 38 |
> > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper |
| 39 |
> fix) with |
| 40 |
> > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will |
| 41 |
> need to |
| 42 |
> > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a |
| 43 |
> release |
| 44 |
> > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two |
| 45 |
> patches) that is |
| 46 |
> > compatible with 2.6.24. |
| 47 |
> > |
| 48 |
> > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely |
| 49 |
> necessary, I |
| 50 |
> > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6 |
| 51 |
> > |
| 52 |
> > -- Steev |
| 53 |
> > |
| 54 |
> |
| 55 |
> -- |
| 56 |
> gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
| 57 |
> |
| 58 |
> |
| 59 |
> |
| 60 |
> |
| 61 |
> -- |
| 62 |
> dott. ing. beso |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
-- |
| 65 |
gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives