1 |
i think that if you're using the flags you're using you're a real gentoo |
2 |
poweruser. but the fact that the profile is still set to 2006.1 makes me |
3 |
wonder if you really know what you're doing... |
4 |
someone who usually uses the flags you're using also uses the latest |
5 |
profile. |
6 |
i really think that you should update your profile (use eselect profile to |
7 |
do it, i think that 2006.1 would disappear in some months) and then compile |
8 |
at least the base system from the amd64 branch. then you could use |
9 |
gcc-4.2.2and other things the way you want. i personally use a lot of |
10 |
unstable stuff, |
11 |
but the base system is amd64 and not ~amd64. |
12 |
|
13 |
2008/1/29, agtdino <agtdino@××××××××.es>: |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Hello, Thank's for the response I will change kernel to 2.6.23-r6. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Regard's |
18 |
> |
19 |
> El mar, 29-01-2008 a las 02:31 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski escribió: |
20 |
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:17 +0100, agtdino wrote: |
21 |
> > > Hi, |
22 |
> > Hi! |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > I am the maintainer of madwifi-ng - it is currently incompatible (well |
25 |
> > there is a patch in bugzilla however it is not the proper fix) with |
26 |
> > 2.6.24 - if you absolutely must have 2.6.24, then you will need to |
27 |
> > compile the madwifi modules from svn, until they put out a release |
28 |
> > (which *should* be soon, they are only waiting on two patches) that is |
29 |
> > compatible with 2.6.24. |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > Sorry for your troubles, for now, unless it is absolutely necessary, I |
32 |
> > would suggest continuing using 2.6.23-r6 |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> > -- Steev |
35 |
> > |
36 |
> |
37 |
> -- |
38 |
> gentoo-amd64@l.g.o mailing list |
39 |
> |
40 |
> |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
-- |
44 |
dott. ing. beso |