| 1 |
Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>Jesús Guerrero <6thpink@×××××.es> posted |
| 4 |
>200608221942.05382.6thpink@×××××.es, excerpted below, on Tue, 22 Aug 2006 |
| 5 |
>19:42:05 +0200: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>>I never had such a problem, but if the problem is that automake cannot find |
| 10 |
>>the qt4 libs for some reason, and you dont need qt4 support, maybe you could |
| 11 |
>>try to compile with USE="qt3 -qt4". |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
>> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
>This is what I'm doing right now, and I have >x11-libs/qt-3.99 in my |
| 16 |
>package.mask as well, as I have no need for it at present and there |
| 17 |
>have-been/will-be multiple qt4 updates (thus remerges) before I do need it |
| 18 |
>that I'm able to skip ATM. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
>When the first big KDE-4 tests come out later this year (there's a KDE-4 |
| 21 |
>developer preview out already, but it's nothing I'm willing to play with |
| 22 |
>at this early stage and I don't believe there are Gentoo ebuilds for it), |
| 23 |
>I'll have to revisit that, certainly removing my qt4 package.mask and |
| 24 |
>merging it, and deciding whether I want to turn on USE=qt4 in general, or |
| 25 |
>not. However, until then, as I said, having it in package.mask means I've |
| 26 |
>avoided unnecessarily merging several versions of it already, in addition |
| 27 |
>to avoiding problems such as the one of this thread. |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
The -qt4 flag worked perfectly! thank you all for your help! |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Sincerely. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Rafael |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives