| 1 |
Jesús Guerrero <6thpink@×××××.es> posted |
| 2 |
200608221942.05382.6thpink@×××××.es, excerpted below, on Tue, 22 Aug 2006 |
| 3 |
19:42:05 +0200: |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
> I never had such a problem, but if the problem is that automake cannot find |
| 6 |
> the qt4 libs for some reason, and you dont need qt4 support, maybe you could |
| 7 |
> try to compile with USE="qt3 -qt4". |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
This is what I'm doing right now, and I have >x11-libs/qt-3.99 in my |
| 10 |
package.mask as well, as I have no need for it at present and there |
| 11 |
have-been/will-be multiple qt4 updates (thus remerges) before I do need it |
| 12 |
that I'm able to skip ATM. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
When the first big KDE-4 tests come out later this year (there's a KDE-4 |
| 15 |
developer preview out already, but it's nothing I'm willing to play with |
| 16 |
at this early stage and I don't believe there are Gentoo ebuilds for it), |
| 17 |
I'll have to revisit that, certainly removing my qt4 package.mask and |
| 18 |
merging it, and deciding whether I want to turn on USE=qt4 in general, or |
| 19 |
not. However, until then, as I said, having it in package.mask means I've |
| 20 |
avoided unnecessarily merging several versions of it already, in addition |
| 21 |
to avoiding problems such as the one of this thread. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 25 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 26 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |
Archives