1 |
On 9/29/06, Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
2 |
> On 9/29/06, Bob Young <BYoung@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > > But they *do* accurately reflect the relationship between vendors and |
4 |
> > > users from Duncan's viewpoint. Your viewpoint is obviously different, |
5 |
> > > but doesn't mean yours is the only "true" one. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > Oh please, spare me the relative truth crap. You can argue all you want that |
8 |
> > it's true from Duncan's perspective because that's the way it *feels* to |
9 |
> > him. In the end that's just feel good rationalization and total bullshit. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> Ok, so now you are saying that Duncan's opinion is wrong. You don't |
12 |
> respect Duncan's opinion, but you expect us to respect yours? I call |
13 |
> hypocrite. |
14 |
|
15 |
BTW, just for the record, I do not equate closed source with slavery. |
16 |
Nobody is going to be stoned, crucified, or burned at the stake for |
17 |
refusing to use some piece of software. It is a choice of which |
18 |
software to use, and for almost all cases, there is enough competition |
19 |
in the industry that nobody should feel enslaved by their choices. |
20 |
|
21 |
However, I also recognize that Duncan has much stronger opinions on |
22 |
the subject than I do, so I understand why he uses the terms that he |
23 |
does. When he uses the terms, I have no misunderstanding of what he |
24 |
means, even if I don't agree. So I consider them perfectly accurate |
25 |
representations of his opinions. |
26 |
|
27 |
-Richard |
28 |
-- |
29 |
gentoo-amd64@g.o mailing list |