| 1 |
I took a quick look this morning. I think there is some support for |
| 2 |
Win 7/8 on 64-bit systems. I am attempting to bring up KVM now. May |
| 3 |
have something to say in a few days. Would be very helpful to know how |
| 4 |
to convert a VB VM as full installed take a lot more time. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Cheers |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
On 2/4/15, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> wrote: |
| 9 |
> Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:02:02 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
>> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Tamas Karpati <tkarpati@×××××.com> |
| 12 |
>> wrote: |
| 13 |
>>> |
| 14 |
>>> Thanks for your toughts. Following your suggestion I'm going to |
| 15 |
>>> evaluate VB while experimenting a bit more with WS. |
| 16 |
>>> I think I'll let them compete. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
>> If you're going to consider something new I'd certainly look at KVM as |
| 19 |
>> well (libvirt/virt-manager/etc). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Since I can't/won't agree to EULAs I don't run proprietary, and would |
| 22 |
> strongly prefer KVM here. However... |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Last I knew KVM didn't support MS-based VMs. Has that changed? Because |
| 25 |
> while if anything that's a positive for me, it's going to put KVM out of |
| 26 |
> the running for many, if it's still true. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> And if kvm supports MS VMs now, I'd like to know that, as it could come |
| 29 |
> in handy in the next thread like this, even if I'll never be using it |
| 30 |
> myself (unless someone else, say an employer, is taking responsibility |
| 31 |
> for that EULA thing I won't personally agree to). =:^) |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> -- |
| 34 |
> Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 35 |
> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 36 |
> and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> |
| 39 |
> |
Archives