| 1 |
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Feb 2015 13:02:02 -0500 as excerpted: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Tamas Karpati <tkarpati@×××××.com> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> |
| 6 |
>> Thanks for your toughts. Following your suggestion I'm going to |
| 7 |
>> evaluate VB while experimenting a bit more with WS. |
| 8 |
>> I think I'll let them compete. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> If you're going to consider something new I'd certainly look at KVM as |
| 11 |
> well (libvirt/virt-manager/etc). |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Since I can't/won't agree to EULAs I don't run proprietary, and would |
| 14 |
strongly prefer KVM here. However... |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Last I knew KVM didn't support MS-based VMs. Has that changed? Because |
| 17 |
while if anything that's a positive for me, it's going to put KVM out of |
| 18 |
the running for many, if it's still true. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And if kvm supports MS VMs now, I'd like to know that, as it could come |
| 21 |
in handy in the next thread like this, even if I'll never be using it |
| 22 |
myself (unless someone else, say an employer, is taking responsibility |
| 23 |
for that EULA thing I won't personally agree to). =:^) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. |
| 27 |
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- |
| 28 |
and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman |
Archives