| 1 |
2008/5/31 Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Beso <givemesugarr@×××××.com> posted |
| 4 |
> d257c3560805310853j7bd01489pa5b74f1d69ae0383@××××××××××.com, excerpted |
| 5 |
> below, on Sat, 31 May 2008 15:53:37 +0000: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > well, firefox 4 would go with webkit and qt4. there's an announce from |
| 8 |
> > the firefox project director. gecko is unmantainable and veryyyy slow, |
| 9 |
> > so the only one who will continue to use it would be iexploder. also the |
| 10 |
> > new qt4 utils and the ability to build an app that runs cross platform |
| 11 |
> > with much less work would be quite interesting. and now maybe also |
| 12 |
> > openoffice would think about switching to it. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> That'd be interesting. Safari/Konqueror/Firefox/Qt/Qtopia all using the |
| 15 |
> same webkit core. That'd pressure MS even more effectively. I wonder |
| 16 |
> what the chances of getting Opera online with it too, might be? They've |
| 17 |
> stayed proprietary, but with that sort of open source union going on, I |
| 18 |
> could see them taking advantage of the LGPL renderer if it might have |
| 19 |
> some chance of turning the tables on MS. They could still keep |
| 20 |
> everything else proprietary. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
well, qt and qtopia are on webkit, safari was the forewarder on it, opera |
| 24 |
too maybe will emulate it, as it does now, since its motor is quite good |
| 25 |
now, but has less compatibility with sites that don't follow the web |
| 26 |
standards... damn that devs that still create sites not following |
| 27 |
standards!!!! |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> >> Hopefully klibido follows to KDE4. It'd be a shame to see it stuck on |
| 31 |
> >> KDE3, after all the work that has gone into it and as sparse on the |
| 32 |
> >> ground as real binary news harvesters seem to be. |
| 33 |
> >> |
| 34 |
> > i really hope so. it's good to have it around. |
| 35 |
> |
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
> I don't know if you've been to the site recently. I just checked. |
| 38 |
> Nothing since 2006. It may be worth joining the user list if you haven't |
| 39 |
> already and dropping and inquiry. If that doesn't work, contact him |
| 40 |
> directly and see. That assumes the question hasn't been asked and |
| 41 |
> answered and is in a list archive on gmane or something, already. (Just |
| 42 |
> checked gmane, don't see it there.) |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
on the klibido site?! maybe its devs have gone with gtk+ and pan.... :-( |
| 46 |
|
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
> > it's a little too complicated to me. i'm usually using pan just for |
| 49 |
> > browsing the newsgroups and read some text articles. |
| 50 |
> |
| 51 |
> |
| 52 |
> So you're not too serious about the downloading thing, like every day or |
| 53 |
> whatever, only maybe once a week or so, when you get time? I can see |
| 54 |
> that, and in fact don't do a lot of binary downloading here, either, tho |
| 55 |
> when I do, I tend to get REALLY serious about it for awhile. Sort of |
| 56 |
> like Charles with developing pan, I guess. I'll go awhile without, then |
| 57 |
> get REALLY serious and go to town on it for awhile, before I get too busy |
| 58 |
> again... |
| 59 |
> |
| 60 |
> Yeah, in that case, for simple browsing and pick and choose here and |
| 61 |
> there downloading, most of the techniques I mentioned aren't particularly |
| 62 |
> useful. |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
yep, that was quite the point. it could be useful if i would have to put |
| 66 |
some cron jobs over big serious downloads, but for that i'd chose a terminal |
| 67 |
nzb capable and do some scripts on it and cron. |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
|
| 70 |
-- |
| 71 |
dott. ing. beso |
Archives